System Indicators

Draft Report
(For Review & Comment)

Prepared by the

System Indicators Team

Debra Giordano - Tompkins County, Captain
Alice Savino - Herkimer/Madison/Oneida
Butch Rehm - Saratoga/Warren/Washington
Danielle DeMatteis - Yonkers
David See - Niagara
Ed Kenny - Hempstead
Gail Breen - Fulton/Montgomery/Schoharie
Gene Faber - Oyster Bay
James Calnon - Clinton/Essex/Franklin/ Hamilton
Joan Sinclair - Cattaraugus/Allegany
Judy Davison - Cayuga/Cortland
Karen Springmeier - Finger Lakes
Kevin Price - Chenango/Delaware/Otsego
Laura Quigley - Sullivan
Martin Delsignore - Jefferson/Lewis
Mary Alane Wiltse - Columbia/Greene
Pam Weisberg - Rockland


INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE

The System Indicators Team (SIT) was created to initiate a process to identify “locally agreed upon – State directed” indicators for the New York State workforce system.

The indicators are intended to measure how well the workforce system is developing, integrating, improving and responding to community needs, beyond the program measures already established by federal agencies.

This report provides the Team’s recommendations on Operating Principles and System Indicators. The operating principles guided the approach embedded in the recommended indicators.

The recommendations serve as a starting point and template for a State Workforce Investment Board policy on the use of system indicators by all New York State Local Workforce Investment Boards.

The background information that led to the Team’s recommendations is presented in the “System Indicators Background Report (11/12/2002).

OPERATING PRINCIPLES

The SIT began this process by establishing a set of operating principles that align with the spirit and intent of the Workforce Investment Act and the mission of the SWIB for an integrated, customer-demand driven and continuously improving workforce system.

The Team’s operating principles are:

  1. The recommended system indicators are a starting point for working towards and developing more refined indicators of system performance.
  2. Focus should be Statewide local measures, and should reinforce “system”, not “center” or “program.”
  3. The recommended indicators must be relevant to the State and Local Workforce Investment Boards, Chief Local Elected Officials (CLEO) and system partners.
  4. The two primary customers of the system are:
  5. There must be a strong commitment by all local areas to supply the core data to a common database (electronically or otherwise), in order to establish consistency in measuring and interpreting indicators.
  6. The data collection process to support calculation of the indicators must not be onerous on system partners.
  7. The indicators should lend themselves to a system report card.
  8. Report cards should provide a local context (e.g., local economic conditions) for the indicators.
  9. The indicators should promote system integration and continuous improvement.
  10. The indicators should be designed to highlight success rather than failure.
  11. All system partners would share system outcomes (successes).

SYSTEM INDICATORS

Over 40 performance measures were identified through SIT and LWIB information gathering, for consideration by the Team as system indicators. From these, the SIT recommends the following system indicators:

  1. Market Penetration
  2. Total System Investment
  3. Customer Repeat Usage

Market Penetration

Total System Investment

Customer Repeat Usage